Opposing California State Senate Bill No. 50 (Wiener) - Housing Development: Incentives - Unless Amended

File # 190398Ver. 3ResolutionIntroduced Apr 17, 2019
Sign in to save
Passed
Passed Dec 19, 2019
Enacted Dec 19, 2019
# 541-19

Alerts

Sign in to get an email when this item moves: new agenda appearance, attachment added, status change, or vote recorded.

Sign in to follow →

Ask about this resolution

History 9 records

Date Ver. Body Action Result Video
Jan 2, 2020 3 TRANSMITTED Details →
Dec 20, 2019 3 RETURNED UNSIGNED Details →
Dec 16, 2019 3 Board of Supervisors ADOPTED Passed10-1 Details →
Dec 10, 2019 2 Government Audit and Oversight Committee RECOMMENDED Passed2-0 Details →
Dec 4, 2019 3 Government Audit and Oversight Committee CONTINUED AS AMENDED Passed3-0 Details →
Dec 4, 2019 2 Government Audit and Oversight Committee AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE Passed3-0 Details →
Apr 9, 2019 1 DUPLICATED Details →
Apr 9, 2019 1 Board of Supervisors AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE Passed11-0 Details →
Apr 9, 2019 2 Board of Supervisors RE-REFERRED AS AMENDED Passed11-0 Details →

Version history 3 recordsCompare versions →

This item changed between first reading and enactment.

  1. 1 499 charsFeb 25, 2026
  2. 2 1,541 charsFeb 25, 2026
  3. 3 5,885 charsFeb 25, 2026CURRENT

Full text version 3

Show ordinance text (1,541 chars)
Title Resolution opposing California State Senate Bill No. 50, authored by Senator Scott Wiener, which would undermine community participation in planning for the well-being of the environment and the public good, prevent the public from recapturing an equitable portion of the economic benefits conferred to private interests, and significantly restrict San Francisco’s ability to protect vulnerable communities from displacement and gentrification, unless further amended. Version (Version 2) Amendment (April 9, 2019 - AMENDED IN BOARD, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING THE SAME TITLE, to insert, 'FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco requests that SB 50 be amended to address significant concerns regarding: 1) Use of SB 50 as the base zoning for purposes of calculating the State Density Bonus; 2) Additional incentives or concessions; 3) The authority of local jurisdictions to deny demolition permits to code-complying SB 50 projects which involve demolition of existing residential units; 4) Local authority to increase inclusionary requirements on SB 50 projects; 5) Use of SB 50 incentives for construction of ‘monster homes;’ 6) Treatment of extant and future local Area Plans that increased zoned capacity to levels akin to SB 50; 7) Amend application of Costa Hawkins and the Ellis Act to allow for greater tenant protection in sensitive communities; and 8) A meaningful process for community feedback on the proposed boundaries of sensitive communities; and, be it.')